User talk:Palosirkka

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Palosirkka!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Palosirkka!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Pyroom.png was uncategorized on 15 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:04, 16 October 2010 (UTC)
• Image:ColorCode.png was uncategorized on 26 February 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:32, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Complejo56.svg was uncategorized on 7 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 21:24, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Pcb eda.png was uncategorized on 19 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:37, 20 October 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Electric eda.png was uncategorized on 19 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 19:37, 20 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Pavel_Sukhoi_(Павел_Сухой).jpg

File:Pavel_Sukhoi_(Павел_Сухой).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 23:00, 20 January 2011 (UTC)

Your Flickr uploads

Hello Palosirkka!

Thanks a lot for your contributions! Thank you for transferring images from Flickr to Commons! Two hints ahead:

• Always upload the highest resolution of a photograph that is available on flickr
• You can use this tool for your flickr uploads. It makes the whole procedure much easier and faster for you!
  

Thank you for your support! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 10:00, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Hi High Contrast and thank you for the kind words of encouragement and advice! Doesn't the User:FlickreviewR bot nowadays pretty much take care of making sure the highest reso is available? It's somewhat tedious to do manually, especially on a relatively slow uplink connection. I'll certainly take Flinfo for a spin, looks interesting. Palosirkka (talk) 11:06, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Flinfo rocks! Palosirkka (talk) 08:12, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Do not add internet links to picture pages

Do not add internet links to picture pages that not needed, only sourcelinks are in scope.--Motopark (talk) 10:47, 27 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Fucking laundry.jpg

File:Fucking laundry.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sreejith K (talk) 05:30, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

File:Redacted777.jpg

File:Redacted777.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Janschejbal (talk) 01:19, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Thanks

For finding the old junk...:) --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:29, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

File:David Tutwiler - Homeward Bound.jpg

File:David Tutwiler - Homeward Bound.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Asclepias (talk) 15:53, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Mako debconf7.jpg

File:Mako debconf7.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 10:58, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Foot xray.jpg

File:Foot xray.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 11:04, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

File:OptiCoat of Arms of Germany.svg

File:OptiCoat of Arms of Germany.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 ^eh? 18:57, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

File:OptiFlag of Australia.svg

File:OptiFlag of Australia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 ^eh? 18:59, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

File:OptiUS-GreatSeal-Obverse.svg

File:OptiUS-GreatSeal-Obverse.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 ^eh? 19:01, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

File:OptiOTRS Wikimedia.svg

File:OptiOTRS Wikimedia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Fry1989 ^eh? 19:04, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

File:OptiFlag of Argentina.svg

File:OptiFlag of Argentina.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ALE! ¿…? 06:54, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Improving with Scour

Hello Palosirkka, I see you improve lots of SVGs with this. But please be careful, do you now that Scour is a little bit imperfekt and buggy? The development and support is seams simply inactive too, but you can also ask User:DieBuche for aid. If you find some exsamplse for this bug that would be helpful. Regards -- πϵρήλιο ℗ 13:31, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Perhelion! Yes, I realize nothing's perfect but I've had great success with Scour. I've only noticed a few images changing visually. Thanks for the heads up! Palosirkka (talk) 13:40, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

It is not really legal to change copyrighted and trademarked images and upload them, nor is it pretty polite since the images either have to be hand-checked for any malicious content or plainly reverted. Would be wise to restrict your work on free images. Thanks. --grin ✎ 13:52, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Face-grin.svg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 21:08, 12 September 2012 (UTC)

Orthographic projection: Papua

Hi, I see that you recently uploaded new versions of File:Asia (orthographic projection).svg and File:Oceania (orthographic projection).svg. Between them, these two maps have a problem - en:Papua, Indonesia, i.e. the western half of New Guinea island - is omitted from both maps. I think that it should be on the Asia one, even though en:Papua New Guinea (which is the eastern half of the same island) is on the Oceania map. Do you think that it could be added, please? --Redrose64 (talk) 20:51, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, probably should be on either one. Tried adding it. Palosirkka (talk) 06:31, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Flag of Slovenia.svg

File:Flag of Slovenia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 13:29, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of the Netherlands - 02.svg

File:Coat of arms of the Netherlands - 02.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Katepanomegas (talk) 15:21, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Wikimedia logos

Hi, you have uploaded derivative logos of the Wikimedia logos and ask for replacement. As most are copyrighted and trademarked by the Wikimedia Foundation I doubt it's possible we fullfil your requests. Moreover I'm thinking to nominate thoses files for deletion because it's clearly misleading (and probably do not repsect the (c) and (tm) of the Wikimedia Foundation). Best regards --PierreSelim (talk) 07:49, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi! I don't understand what is misleading and think trademarks have nothing to do with this. Copyright infringement this clearly is but I don't think Wikimedia would sue me considering I'm only trying to help. And nobody else can. Palosirkka (talk) 12:47, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

"Scrubbing" SVGs

Hello! You started to upload several "scrubbed" SVGs that I have on my watch list, especially location maps. I just compared the new version of File:Czech Republic location map.svg with the one before. Your "scrubbing" ist not only deleting code that is not necessary for the appearance of the map, it cuts the way how the vectors are described, for example: 697.32642, 297.62214 becomes 697.33, 297.62. Of course the file gets smaller but please have in mind that these maps sometimes get scaled to produce new maps and then all these numbers behind the point get important. Deleting these numbers make the maps worse and only save very few disk space. I suggest you stop scrubbing location maps and revert your uploads. Regards, NNW (talk) 12:07, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Good point. Will do. Palosirkka (talk) 12:28, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! NNW (talk) 12:47, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi, per this discussion I've rejected your various outstanding edit requests relating to replacing SVGs with scrubbed versions. If you want to pursue this again, I think a central discussion proposing the changes (eg at COM:VP) is a better way to handle it than lots of edit requests. Rd232 (talk) 14:10, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Emblem of SFR Yugoslavia.svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Emblem of SFR Yugoslavia.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Eleassar ^(t/p) 11:16, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Emblem of SFR Yugoslavia.svg

File:Emblem of SFR Yugoslavia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 18:59, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Emblem of SFR Yugoslavia.svg

File:Emblem of SFR Yugoslavia.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eleassar ^(t/p) 17:31, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Reclining Nude Szobotka.jpg

File:Reclining Nude Szobotka.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

 Ronhjones  ^(Talk) 00:59, 2 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Catherine Manoukian.jpg

File:Catherine Manoukian.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

— ΛΧΣ²¹ 14:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

File:20 décembre 1952 by soulages.jpg

File:20 décembre 1952 by soulages.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

90.2.97.243 18:53, 13 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Beach couple 2352352.jpg

File:Beach couple 2352352.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leyo 16:39, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Fortune cookie icon.png

File:Fortune cookie icon.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

McZusatz (talk) 12:32, 20 April 2013 (UTC)

•  Comment: It looks like you unintentionally uploaded a copy vio as an Admin just noted It may be safer to delete. --Leoboudv (talk) 01:07, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up! Palosirkka (talk) 07:59, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Distribucion de Broteochactas gollmeri en Venezuela 2013D 000.jpg and File:Distribucion de Broteochactas gollmeri en el estado Miranda 2013d 000.jpg

Sorry friend, but what you ask in the template do not know, I work as I understand. Regards.--Veronidae (talk) 14:38, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

Could you please use the lossless PNG format for such images? --McZusatz (talk) 13:08, 21 May 2013 (UTC)

copyvio-tagging

Hi Palosirkka, thanks for pointing to potential copyvios. However, instead of simply writing "probably" it would be better to describe why you think a file might be a copyvio or to provide a URL. Thanks. --Túrelio (talk) 13:00, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Hello! Yeah, I can see why that would be useful. I'll try to be more verbose in the future. I've been trying to look for a is-this-a-copyvio-template but haven't found one. I guess there might not be one as copyvio is a serious allegation and doesn't go well with uncertainly or something. Palosirkka (talk) 15:40, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

copyvio-tagging

You tagged a screen shot of matlab output that I uploaded as a copyright violation. I counted over 1000 uploads to wikimedia commons that were described as screen shots. Are they all copyright violations? --1sfoerster (talk) 17:18, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Unlikely. May I recommend you familiarize yourself with Commons:Licensing. Palosirkka (talk) 07:00, 25 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright violations.

Hello. I got messages today about some files suggested for deletion and it seems like the files are already deleted. The files were transfered from sv.wikibooks where it stated that they had appropriate licences. There are probably more files that I have transfered where the licences might be questionable. Please let me know if you find more and I'll restore them on sv.wb where we are currently discussing about a fair use policy. - Averater (talk) 11:20, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Hi! Will do. Palosirkka (talk) 14:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Bad JPG annotation

Yesterday, you left a note on several of my images for

All images in this user talk were uploaded in the JPEG format even though it consists of non-photographic data. This information could be stored more efficiently or accurately in the PNG or SVG format. If possible, please upload a PNG or SVG version of this image without compression artifacts, derived from a non-JPEG source (or with existing artifacts removed). After doing so, please tag the JPEG version with {{Superseded|NewImage.ext}} and remove this tag. This tag should not be applied to photographs or scans. For more information, see {{BadJPEG}}.

The .PNG versions of these files are 10 times the size (and don't provide any better resolution because some of the source is exported from my source as .JPG.

I can convert the .JPG or even upload a more original .PNG -at over 12MB per pic.

Jgmoxness (talk) 13:50, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

As the template reads "please provide better, if possible". I guess this is one of those cases where it isn't. Feel free to ignore the template. Palosirkka (talk) 14:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Mindview Graphics

I am sure I did not properly document the fact that permission was coming for the files listed below that I uploaded while updating the Mindview page.

File:Mindview-screenshot.png

File:Mindview-mindmap-screenshot.png

File:MindView-Timeline.png

File:MindView-Gantt Chart.png

File:MindView Logo.png

I did update the talk pages of each file and am including a copy of the email from MatchWare Inc. below. Is there anything else I need to do. Thanks Steveswei (talk) 17:49, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

Merrild 1:28 PM (16 minutes ago) to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org

I hereby affirm that MatchWare is the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of

File:Mindview-screenshot.png File:Mindview-mindmap-screenshot.png File:MindView-Timeline.png File:MindView-Gantt Chart.png File:MindView Logo.png

I agree to publish these work under the free license "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported" and GNU Free Documentation License (unversioned, with no invariant sections, front-cover texts, or back-cover texts).

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.

I am aware that the free license only concerns copyright, and I reserve the option to take action against anyone who uses this work in a libelous way, or in violation of personality rights, trademark restrictions, etc.

I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the work may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Kind regards,

Ulrik Merrild

CEO

MatchWare Inc.

311 S. Brevard Ave.

Tampa, FL 33606

Ph: 1-813-254-6644

Fax: 1-813-254-6654

Hi! I'm not familiar with the procedure but it should be documented here Commons:OTRS. Since you knew where to send the email you probably know more about it than I do. We get a fair number of copyvios and try to filter those out. I guess if you should upload another image which would likely get tagged as copyvio without extra measures, it would make sense to add a Template:OTRS pending. Take care. Palosirkka (talk) 19:46, 28 May 2013 (UTC)

File:TrueCrypt 6.1a Ubuntu.png

Why did you add this deletion request ? It is a screenshot of an open source software on an opensource OS.

Truecrypt is not open source. Please sign your messages with ~~~~ in the future. Palosirkka (talk) 08:50, 29 May 2013 (UTC)

File: Eaglepcb.png AND Eaglesch.png

why where these file deleted? they where screen shots taken by me of a free version of EAGLE CAD with an open source project open. kozlojak (talk)

Because eagle is proprietary. It may be free as in gratis but not free as in freedom. Sorry but that's what the law says. We cannot host proprietary software screenshots on Commons. Palosirkka (talk) 17:06, 30 May 2013 (UTC)

Doublecad

Ciao!! Sono una studentessa e ho partecipato alla stesura del manuale di Doublecad in italiano. Non sapevamo che vigessero queste regole per gli screenshot, così il mio Professore sta chiedendo l'autorizzazione alla Imsi per le immagini. Saluti.--Alelaterza (talk) 10:09, 31 May 2013 (UTC) Hi!! I'm a student and I took part to translate Doublecad textbook in italian with my teacher. We didn't know about screenshot, so my teacher is asking to the software proprietor about images authorization. Greetings --2.238.55.72 16:29, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Hello! OK, next time you upload such screenshots you might want to use the Commons:OTRS system. Take care! Palosirkka (talk) 06:02, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Could you help me?

Could you help me replacing Organograma_da_arquitetura_da_rede_I2P.jpeg with a better resolution one from here: http://www.oschina.net/project/tag/187/security-framework?lang=19&sort=view ??

Hello there! Looks like there is a licensing issue with that image. You originally uploaded it claiming it's an image made by you, which apparently isn't the case but instead you got it from that Chinese web site? I think it's a borderline case whether it is simple enough to not get copyright, I'm not an expert. We would not have to decide that in case somebody has explicitly stated that it's released under a license accepted on Commons, is there a free license? A larger version is here [1]. Please sign your messages in the future with ~~~~, thank you. Palosirkka (talk) 08:44, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

jpg != png

Hi. So you know, the same image in jpg is not considered an exact duplicate if the file in png file format, well not in terms of enabling an admin to speedily delete either, see Commons:deletion policy. If you wish to progress a deletion, then it needs to go through a normal deletion process.  — billinghurst sDrewth 13:02, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Chihuli glass boat.jpg

File:Chihuli glass boat.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:11, 24 June 2013 (UTC)

No headline...

Every image I upload to wiki commons is my own propriety. Please restore my images that you have falsely deleted. Next time check before doing something so rash and which violates my rights.

User_talk:Kevlangdo

--Kevlangdo (talk) 17:39, 25 June 2013 (UTC)

Please familiarize yourself with Commons:Licensing. We cannot host screenshots of proprietary software without the copyright holders permit. The copyright holder of the software, that is. Palosirkka (talk) 14:51, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

Deletions and duplicates for Department of Defense uploads

Hi, thanks for taking time to review some of these uploads. Two points have come up with your recent tagging though:

1. You have created a few deletion requests which have not completed correctly. The DR discussion pages have not been created and I have not been notified as the uploader. This might be caused by the script you are using timing out. Example: File:U.S. Navy Engineman Fireman Olusanya Oyeyemi reads a passage from the Bible during a Catholic service aboard the guided missile frigate USS Simpson (FFG 56) off the coast of Dakar, Senegal, March 10, 2012 120310-N-ON468-003.jpg.
2. When you mark a duplicate where the same image has different VIRINs (which according to the DoD are supposed to be unique), as you did with File:U.S. Navy Seaman Apprentice Cody Jelinek removes rust from a mooring aboard the guided missile frigate USS Simpson (FFG 56) in the Sierra Leone Basin March 11, 2012 120311-N-ON468-007.jpg, could you please add the additional VIRIN to the description of the file that will remain? This will avoid problems with the same image being uploaded again. Unfortunately as the VIRIN is in the EXIF data for the file, the automatic hash check that Commons does for uploads cannot identify these as duplicates as this includes the EXIF data, so checking whether the VIRIN exists or not in a file description is as good as we can do for the moment (which is how I avoid this problem for new uploads). In this example I have gone ahead and noted it in the information box.

By the way, if you would like to help with a backlog of known duplicates that need checking this way, it would be great if you could spend some time looking at the analysis I ran at User:Faebot/SandboxL. This includes links to handy searches for the VIRINs which may speed up the decision making process of which to keep. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 12:07, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Hello. Regarding 1. I only added the delete template by hand (I don't do JavaScript) and don't really know how to do a proper deletion request, seems like a huge hassle. I hope and believe that my deletion actions are still rather useful than negative. 2. I'll try to remember to do that. And I might take a look at that list of yours if I have time in the future. Thanks for the comments. Palosirkka (talk) 14:31, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, you should be able to see a link in the left hand Toolbox to Nominate for deletion. You then just have to fill in the nomination text and the tool takes care of the rest. You can find an explanation at Help:Nominate for deletion. --Fæ (talk) 15:05, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the suggestion but that would require allowing JavaScript. Palosirkka (talk) 15:08, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

File:City locator 14.svg

File:City locator 14.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

96.22.103.207 22:41, 3 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Bitcoin exchange.png

File:Bitcoin exchange.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Johnson Lau (talk) 05:32, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Emblem-important.svg

File:Emblem-important.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Khalifa18 (talk) 22:58, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

gnux user images

Hello,

I am a french teacher that organizes the work for this student team (gnux), they have to write and present an excel lesson on wikiversity to other students tomorrow (November 28th). It's very difficult to write a lesson without images of type screen shots. When i have given them the job, I was not aware of the "software screen shot interdictions" on Wikicommons, so the mistake is coming from me, it will never happen again later. We have already found another solution for new images (external links), which can be efficient. But for the old images and links written on their lessons in last 14 days, can you, please, delay the suppression of images to friday, November 29th, just the necessary delay to be quiet during their presentation ?

Thanks a lot.

See you soon.

Mamagalubru

Hi there! I'm afraid I cannot help you as the images are already deleted and I'm not an admin and cannot undelete the images. Besides that, the images were infringing copyright and thus the policy of Commons so I'm not sure anybody would undelete them. I won't however tag any more images until friday. I guess your students learned a valuable lesson about copyright in this process. I would also like to take this chance to point you to a free office program you could make screenshots of and post those on Commons, LibreOffice. Palosirkka (talk) 20:05, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

File:India (orthographic projection).svg

File:India (orthographic projection).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ankr93 (talk) 08:53, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Helsinki_pride

Category:Helsinki_pride has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at Commons:Categories for discussion/2013/12/Category:Helsinki_pride. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

PanchoS (talk) 04:47, 8 December 2013 (UTC)

Maps

I don't understand you. Maps are created by myself using, as usual here, openstreetmap, that's released with proper licence: what is the problem? In it.wiki we all use do it....--Ale Sasso (talk) 23:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Please, I see that u are proposed for deleting all my maps... why? What is the correct tag that I have to use in your opinion? --Ale Sasso (talk) 23:15, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok. I tried to correct and now I hope the string is correct. Isn't it? I'm not sure to have fixed all files: please, can you check? Thanks.--Ale Sasso (talk) 23:40, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok... I found your history-log and consequently fixed all maps. Please, next time propose to delete pictures after a discussion and not before ;) Thanks and good night (here is 01.05...)--Ale Sasso (talk) 00:02, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Ooook. Now also the file you're shown me is fixed. Your statement is correct (imho)... Anyway, I copied another credits formula which is surely correct (yesss, more than a simple "own") and yet used in Commons. Please, remember: we are use to mark for deletion a file (and, even more so, several files) only before a proper discussion with the author, according with netiquette and wikimedia politeness. Last night I had quickly to change all tags, without any help, going to bed very late and bothering a 6-mounths babe. Note that is not useful for me understand you also 'couse I'm italian/genoese speacking... Next time be a little more enduring, please. ;) Thank you and greetings!--Ale Sasso (talk) 11:07, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Mali (orthographic projection).svg

File:Mali (orthographic projection).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

84.1.151.233 23:56, 11 February 2014 (UTC)

File:OptiHeckert GNU white.svg

File:OptiHeckert GNU white.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Be..anyone (talk) 02:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

File:@@@.svg

File:@@@.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

187.175.7.134 21:53, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Tagging files for copyvios

Hi,

You should use the script VisualFileChange for creating mass deletions, or tagging multiple files. It is much faster, and you are sure that the procedure is properly done. Thanks for your help, Yann (talk) 21:05, 2 April 2014 (UTC)

Pleas add a reason to speedy deletion requests. --Steinsplitter (talk) 17:59, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism is not appreciated

---

 

You have vandalized the content of Wikimedia Commons. Please stop. If you continue making inappropriate edits you may be blocked from editing Commons. You may test freely in the sandbox.

Steinsplitter (talk) 18:03, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Pleas add a reason or i will block you!. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:04, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a duration of 3 days

You have been blocked from editing Commons for a duration of 3 days for the following reason: edit wars. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may add {{unblock|(enter your reason here) ~~~~}} below this message explaining clearly why you should be unblocked. See also the block log. For more information, see Appealing a block.

Yann (talk) 18:08, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Aaand unblocked. Palosirkka (talk) 18:52, 8 April 2014 (UTC)

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Tamil Language Flag 2.svg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tamil Language Flag 2.svg, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Anton^Talk 03:17, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Flag of the United Nations.svg

File:Flag of the United Nations.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

DHeyward (talk) 08:19, 18 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Sports icon.png

File:Sports icon.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, you may replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Эlcobbola _talk 18:43, 15 July 2014 (UTC)

copy right violations for the web science mooc

Hey Palosirkka, you have marked several of our web science videos as possible copy right violations. you can find the statements on User_talk:Rob-nowman. as stated on User_talk:Yann#undo_deletion_request:_File:Eclipse_Installation.webm we have been creating almost all our content ourselves. I would like to understand the problem with those files. I fought hard with the administration of the university to be able to publish our material under CC-BY-SA in order to go for wikicommons and wikiversity and be able to donate the material as open educational resources. best regards --Renepick (talk) 20:51, 21 July 2014 (UTC)

These videos incorporate elements of proprietary/copyrighted software (e.g. Microsoft Word) which in turn makes these videos derivatives of non-free content, which is strictly forbidden and strictly enforced on Commons. If the non-free software buttons/graphics/text is cropped out, these videos can be re-uploaded -FASTILY 09:17, 24 July 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Perlan, Reykjavík.jpg

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 16:31, 19 August 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Gazpacho 7862.jpg

And also:

• File:Sommarswiss.jpg

Yours sincerely, Josve05a (talk) 16:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Altair 8800 pop el 1975 cover ad.jpg

File:Altair 8800 pop el 1975 cover ad.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

72.244.200.124 09:02, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Altair 8800 pop el 1975 cover ad.jpg

File:Altair 8800 pop el 1975 cover ad.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 10:42, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Tagging copyvios

Hi, Could you please inform the uploader. Thanks for your help. Regards, Yann (talk) 14:42, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Sure, I always try to remember to do it. Palosirkka (talk) 15:14, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

File:ITunes 12 Screen.png

Zdravím, mohl bych poprosit o vaše vyjadření se k tématu označení mnou nahraného snímku aplikace na stránce Commons:Hospoda U Commons, kde jsem založil téma z dotazem... Děkuji, --MMMHHH (talk) 20:58, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Can you speak English? Palosirkka (talk) 05:10, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, but you don't have informations about language on your Main Page... Then in english, yesterday, was my upload File:ITunes_12_Screen.png tagged as an image, which can violate the rules... It's a ScreenShot of freeware application by Apple inc., so I thought, that shouldn't be a problem with uploading this file. On the Czech Forum of Wikipedia Commons told me that this is a problem, so I started to deal with the problem differently. Apple inc. has a PR page on which you can find the official photos. https://www.apple.com/pr/products/itunes/itunes.html Just help me, which license should I use for these images? Thank you, and sorry for my english, --MMMHHH (talk) 07:30, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

No worries. I guess the Czech forum already told you this but by default the copyright law says you can't do anything with the file. Freeware is just gratis but gives you no other permission than to use the said software, no screenshots for example. So unless the copyright holder explicitly gives you permission, a license, to do so. So you'll have to find a license somewhere and if you find one that is compatible with Commons, then you can upload it. Refer to COM:L. I think your English is pretty good btw. Palosirkka (talk) 09:33, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Incomplete deletion requests.

Hi, I noticed that you repeatly creating incomplete deletion requests like i.e. here. They ending up in Category:Incomplete deletion requests - missing subpage and/or Category:Deletion_requests_-_No_timestamp_given. To create complete deletion requests you have to:

1. Visit the deletion requests subpage and place the following code: {{subst:delete2|image=File:Cinevid-logo.png|reason=we have a very similar file at File:Cinevid-main.png}} ~~~~
2. Go to the deletion requests log and place the following code at the bottom: {{subst:delete3|pg=File:Cinevid-logo.png}}
3. Notify the item's uploader or the creator of the page by placing the following code on the user's talk page: {{subst:idw|File:Cinevid-logo.png|}} ~~~~
4. Additionally, you may want to check for Wikimedia projects that use this item and then remove or, if possible, replace with a superior item.

as describted when you click on the Click here for further instruction "button".

Iin the last days I completed a lot of your incomplete deletion requests.

The easiest way to ensure you don't forget a step is to enable the "quick delete" gadget within your preferences. Then all steps (except 4.) will be done automaticly when you click on "nominate for deletion" on the sitebar.

Could you try to complete your last imcomplete DRs yourself? regards. --JuTa 20:29, 4 November 2014 (UTC)

Hello and thanks for completing the many DRs in the past. I don't use JavaScript so doing all those steps manually is a huge hassle. Thanks for the clear and comprehensive instructions as well. Take care! Palosirkka (talk) 05:23, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi, I just see you created other incomplete deletion requests. I think I will not complete them anymore like in the past, but will undo your edits when I will check the incomplete deletion requests next time. Again please: When you are raising a deletion request try to do that completely. Thx. --JuTa 21:02, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

User:JuTa... I think you undo action was borderline vandalism. Think of the best of the project please. It's OK if you don't complete my DRs. But don't undo them either. Again I tell you, I will not use JavaScript. You just undoed 32 DRs, if you want to see how much work it would be to do the complete 4 step process every time, go fill those requests manually for the 32 files, that is what you're requiring of me. Palosirkka (talk) 05:13, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

No one is forcing you to use JavaScript. However, you shouldn't just leave a mess for other people to clean up. You have two options: 1) Use JavaScript to complete DRs or 2) Fill out all the paperwork properly by hand. Killiondude (talk) 05:37, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

I my opinion the real mess are the crappy images that should be deleted and now won't be. But since 3 (one more here) admins have said I'm wrong here, expect no more deletion requests from me. Palosirkka (talk) 13:40, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Deletion requests

If you'd like to send me the file names of pages you think are dubious, I'd be happy to take a look and see what can be done about them. Just leave a message on my talk page. I have several folks who can't use the various helpers who suggest "bad ones" to me and I take care of the rest. I'm sorry you don't use the Javascript helpers, they really are super useful! Cheers!! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:47, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Featured Picture Nomination

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that the image Rubik's cube v3.svg, which was created or uploaded by you, has been nominated for featured picture status; have a look at the nomination page. Thank you and good luck!

File:Gaymarriage.jpg

File:Gaymarriage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Closeapple (talk) 23:10, 18 January 2015 (UTC)

File:Altair 8080 pop el 1975 article.jpg

File:Altair 8080 pop el 1975 article.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

czar ⨹ 14:00, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Community memory terminal.jpg

File:Community memory terminal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

czar ⨹ 14:04, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Fun stuff

About 30 months after you suggested a valid version for Checked copyright icon.svg this issue is now resolved. –Be..anyone (talk) 03:54, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

File:Snapshot of Steam with Store Selected.PNG

Why did you ask for my file to be deleted? It was simply a screenshot. Other screenshots I've seen do not get removed. I do not see how I infringed copyright. --Emil Sayahi (talk) 16:36, 4 April 2015 (UTC)

You need to read this Commons:Licensing and then this Commons:Screenshots. Note that Wikipedia has a different policy. Palosirkka (talk) 07:30, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Project scope

Hi Palosirkka, please respect that Commons has a project scope and that contributed images must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. For this reason please give useful categories and useful descriptions to your images. So that every other user can find your images through their categories and can understand what you want to teach with the images through their descriptions. To meet the project scope please keep everything as educational as possible. Keep in mind that most people in the world do not know what is visible in your images and therefore urgently require understandable descriptions and categories made by you! Think twice before you upload images taken by other people whether or not you are able to provide useful descriptions and categories. Particularly note that images of unidentified objects at unidentified locations like File:Where's All The Gold?.jpg are not anyhow educational and therefore do NOT comply with the project scope! -- Ies (talk) 06:07, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Lieksan Vaskiviikon konsertti Mätäsvaaran kaivoslaguunilla.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lieksan Vaskiviikon konsertti Mätäsvaaran kaivoslaguunilla.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Lieksan Vaskiviikon konsertti Mätäsvaaran kaivoslaguunilla.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Smooth_O (talk) 07:51, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Lieksan Vaskiviikon konsertti Lieksan kirkossa.jpg

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Lieksan Vaskiviikon konsertti Lieksan kirkossa.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Lieksan Vaskiviikon konsertti Lieksan kirkossa.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

Smooth_O (talk) 07:53, 21 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Woman wearing earring in front of mirror.jpg

File:Woman wearing earring in front of mirror.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Mrgreen09 (talk) 21:50, 29 July 2015 (UTC)

Wikiversity-logo-en.svg

Hi. You can modify File:Wikiversity-logo-en.svg with Ukrainian text "ВІКІВЕРСИТЕТ" ? — Green Zero обг 15:18, 18 August 2015 (UTC)

Hello Green Zero! I made a version here File:Wikiversity-logo-uk.svg. I used Inkscape for the job. Palosirkka (talk) 12:34, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much! Good job. — Green Zero обг 13:02, 19 August 2015 (UTC)

File:I'm a rappel junkie.jpg

File:I'm a rappel junkie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Leoboudv (talk) 01:29, 22 December 2015 (UTC)

Visual Studio screenshots and copyright

Can you please explain why you think that Visual Studio screenshots of my own program and own code are somehow subject to copyright?

Hi BitBarrel! The screenshots are copyright violations because you're not the copyright holder of the proprietary software in question. Yes, you might own a copy but you can only use it but can't take screenshots of it. That's just the law. Copyright is an international mechanism that gives the copyright holder exclusive rights over the item, others can do very little with it. Palosirkka (talk) 13:23, 6 January 2016 (UTC)

OEIS A117825.jpg

This was marked by you for some reason. It violates nothing, as I state it is my own work.--Billymac00 (talk) 16:35, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Billymac00! Are you the copyright holder of the software in question, i.e. did you write that software? (I can't remember or see what it was anymore) If yes, then it's best to clearly indicate it. If you just purchased a copy of some proprietary software, then your screenshot was a copyvio, unless you have a separate permission for making one and in such a case the permission should be clearly indicated. Palosirkka (talk) 17:20, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

OEIS A117825 has a license line at the bottom, it boils down to File:Creative Commons "Non-Commercial" icon (SVG, nominal 64x64).svg, and as it happens this is how I ended up here five years ago (as former OEIS contributor). Unrelated, I stumbled over this debate while checking why somebody recreated an empty user page for you, but obviously you have no serious objections. Be..anyone (talk) 19:11, 4 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Nuu amb els braços cap endalt.jpg

File:Nuu amb els braços cap endalt.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.204.246.51 11:44, 15 July 2016 (UTC)

File:Shibboleth (Internet2).jpg

File:Shibboleth (Internet2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

+mt 21:41, 24 October 2016 (UTC)

File:Gnu-linux-portrait by david revoy.jpg

File:Gnu-linux-portrait by david revoy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

   FDMS  4    09:15, 23 January 2017 (UTC)

fabian tortoise

It seems to me the tortoise was first used in this 1951 pamphlet ( https://digital.library.lse.ac.uk/objects/lse:tik383teg ), but i might be wrong. Please add the original source, as you did not create the tortoise. If it really was first used in 1951, it may still be in copyright, and so is ineligible for Wikimedia Commons. Thank you.

Source of derivative work is not properly indicated: File:Fabian tortoise 32w352523352.png

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fabian tortoise 32w352523352.png, is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such works would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a map that has been altered from the original. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work. While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted. If you created the original content yourself, enter this information as the source. If someone else created the content, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

 

Lommes (talk) 22:52, 23 April 2017 (UTC)

File:Puzzle stub.png

File:Puzzle stub.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

87.9.48.158 15:43, 10 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Standard World Time Zones.png

File:Standard World Time Zones.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

83.245.227.39 07:36, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Four.Eyed.Monsters.shot.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Four.Eyed.Monsters.shot.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Four.Eyed.Monsters.shot.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

GeorgHH • talk   16:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

File tagging File:Four.Eyed.Monsters.Logo.png

This media was probably deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Four.Eyed.Monsters.Logo.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:OP}} on file description page. Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own. The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Four.Eyed.Monsters.Logo.png]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

 

GeorgHH • talk   16:16, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Stuttgart library interior.jpg

I started a mass deletion request for all interiors of the Stuttgart Stadtbibliothek as they are all unfree h-stt !? 16:35, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

File:Historic Scotland.svg

File:Historic Scotland.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)

Flickr uploads

When uploading images from Flickr you must always upload the highest resolution image that is know as the "original" and not a low resolution image as you did with File:Hard worker.jpg. Even better is to use the Flickr2Commons upload tool that takes care of all the important stuff and choose the best quality image. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 15:31, 7 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Ww2censor and thanks for the suggestion. Sadly the tool requires JavaScript and I don't want to use such things, JS is a safety hazard. I also have a slow network uplink so I rather let the bot do the upload of the largest size image, e.g. [2] Have a nice 2018! --Palosirkka (talk) 12:26, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

It's a pity you have a slow connection but not everyone has great internet speed. Regarding JS, maybe the regular upload wizard, found by clicking the "Upload file" found on the left side of your screen does not use it but I'm not familiar with its technology. The problem is that the bot does not always replace a low resolution version with the highest one meaning that a file must be manually reviewed and the fewer we have to do the better. This was the case of the File:Hard worker.jpg I reviewed because the bot could not find the image at Flickr until it recognised the image as uploaded. Perhaps if you had selected 240 x 160 it might have been able to do the job. I don't know how it recognised the one you mentioned. Thanks anyway. Ww2censor (talk) 14:55, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

I made the bot author aware of this issue User_talk:Zhuyifei1999#Unexpectedly_FlickreviewR_2:_size_not_found. Looks like the problem is a Flickr bug. I fully support offloading work to bots, that's what I'm too trying to do here. --Palosirkka (talk) 17:46, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

File:Africa-countries-northern.svg

Hello.

Can you add Montenegro (because it was forgotten) and color South Sudan in light green (because it is more often counted as part of East Africa as well in regional schemes) in File:Africa-countries-northern.svg you uploaded?

I am adding South Sudan (as well as Montenegro and other possible missing updates) in the PNG maps in Category:Maps needing South Sudan political boundaries and Category:Maps needing Montenegro political boundaries, and then remove this category after updating them. There were close to 1100 maps since I started to update these files from 1 March 2018, now it is reduced to less than 780 maps, but there is a long way to go.

Unfortunately I don't know how to edit SVG maps myself, that is why I asked you.

Thank you.

Maphobbyist (talk) 00:28, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello Maphobbyist! Editing vector files is pretty similar to editing raster files, really. One nice tool for the job is Inkscape. It is free software, under the GPL. Please give it a try, I think you'll like it. Should it prove problematic for whatever reason, which I doubt, I'll gladly help. -- Palosirkka (talk) 14:34, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Hello. Unfortunately, Inkscape cannot be downloaded, I suspect because due to the country where I live which happens to be Turkey, where Wikpedia is banned and blocked, along with thousands of non-political innocent websites (often without any reason, and not just terrorist and extremist websites). As I am totally SVG illiterate, that is why I requested this correction request from you. Kindest regards. Maphobbyist (talk) 20:13, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

@Maphobbyist Wow, sorry to hear that ... I hope it gets better. I tried to make the svg look like the png. My svg is a poor quality job really, somebody should do it properly. -- Palosirkka (talk) 21:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Colorful books.jpg

Yours sincerely, - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 19:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

File:Standard World Time Zones.png

File:Standard World Time Zones.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

MikePollan (talk) 14:11, 25 November 2018 (UTC)

File:Anatomy of the Human Ear fi.svg

File:Anatomy of the Human Ear fi.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Cherkash (talk) 23:12, 17 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Dancer in Sari.jpg

File:Dancer in Sari.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

E4024 (talk) 18:19, 13 March 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Pomegranate Arils.jpg

—LX (talk, contribs) 23:59, 29 March 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Godlo PRL.svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Eatcha 05:23, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 27 April 2019 (UTC)

File:Le Jour ni l"Heure.jpg

File:Le Jour ni l"Heure.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.249.239.104 15:26, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Fruit & vegs assortment.jpg

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 10:56, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Uk-animal-testing-graphic.png

Yours sincerely, BevinKacon (talk) 23:01, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

File:Yana and sunset.jpg

File:Yana and sunset.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Estopedist1 (talk) 20:29, 20 April 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:In the Monastery.jpg

And also:

• File:Locomotive wheels bw.jpg
• File:Tudor Village, Hever Castle.jpg
• File:A Hot Bath.jpg
• File:Kyoto Date Night.jpg

Yours sincerely, GammaThetaMu (talk) 13:40, 27 April 2020 (UTC)

Marking blurry items

Hi Palosirkka. You have started marking a number of images of paintings with the "blurry" template. Not sure what you wish to gain from it, and not sure how productive this effort is. As you can see, the images are rather old, typically 2002 or thereabout. They are used as documentation of the painters' works and they are at the time the ONLY images we have. So it is a choice between uploading or not having the work in our collection. Believe me, I ignore a lot of images of inferior quality from the auction houses, but some are - just - passable. Of course they will be replaced if the painting turns up at a later auction. So there is really no point in having the blurry template, anybody can see that the image is not perfect. You may disagree, and that is your right. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 15:48, 5 May 2020 (UTC)

Hello User:Rsteen! I thought about it and came to the same conclusion. The wording of the template is actually pretty funny. "can be replaced if something better comes along" I mean like you said, that's what anybody would do anyways. Please do understand that I meant no offence with the tagging. What you're doing is great, please don't change anything. I completely agree it's better to have a bad quality version of a painting than nothing. Maybe we should have a {{Not blurry}} instead, as in tagging the good ones... there's plenty of sub par images around. Thanks again for helping bring the great works of art available. And stay safe friend! --Palosirkka (talk) 17:57, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Hi again Palosirkka. I am glad we agree. Maybe the "blurry" template is more relevant for photos of buildings and things. Sometimes people would just upload their shots of a church or a town hall, no matter the quality, and in that case it would be a good idea to mark the photo, to encourage someone to come along and make a better photo. Enjoy your time on Commons and thanks for your kind words. Cheers --Rsteen (talk) 18:59, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Template:Remove border

Hello!

I changed your tagging from {{Remove border}} (which is for still images) to {{Crop video}} so you know. Also, please let the categories be furthest down on all pages and tag files with {{Remove border}}, or perhaps {{BadJPEG}} a bit further up. Preferably above the license header. Cheers - Jonteemil (talk) 20:36, 10 May 2020 (UTC)